b) If the parties are not aware of such acts:- There may be cases where, at the time of the contract, the parties do not know the reality of the contract, but learn, after a certain period of time, that the realization of such an act is impossible. Soon, the parties will learn of the impossibility of the delivery, the agreement becomes obsolete. These agreements are covered by the S.20 provisions regarding Mistake. In most cases, these agreements deal with the absence of the purpose of the contract at the time the contract was concluded. As a result, the agreement is marred by errors as to the existence of the purpose of the contract. In the following example, the point is all the clearer. This section indicates that an agreement reached without consideration is invalid, unless it is written and recorded or if it is a promise to compensate something that has been done or a promise to pay a debt prescribed by the statute of limitations. In India, trade has grown as a whole and it is desirable to develop trade. As a result, the strict provisions of page 27 expressly nullified any agreement that infringes the right to trade. Public order required that every citizen have the freedom to work for himself and that he has the benefit of work for himself or for the state. He should not enter into an agreement that does not allow him to use his skills or talents for his benefit or for the benefit of his country.
If it does so through an agreement, it has no right to do so. The Partnership Act of 1932 provides another exception to the rule limiting trade restriction agreements. There are three exceptions in the law. Here the complainant was the owner of a fleet of buses that were travelling between Pune and Mahabaleshwar. The defendant also had a similar case in the same area. In order to avoid competition, the plaintiff purchased the defendant`s business with the overvalue and contractually forced him not to open a similar business in the area for 3 years. The accused did not comply and began his activities. The Tribunal found that the agreement was valid, as it was the exception of S.27. “Void Agreement” is defined in Section 2 (g) of the Indian Contract Act of 1872 as “an agreement that is not applicable is declared non-applicable.”  In this case, the Supreme Court found that Section 27 could not be explicitly struck down for all agreements (except one exception) and that there were no two meanings to be attributed to the section. The vulnerability test in England cannot be applied in India.
One of the essential conditions for the formation of the contract is that it cannot be declared invalid. Section 10 of the Indian Contracts Act states that “all contracts are contracts… which are not expressly cancelled. A contract can, for example. B, be null and void for several reasons: any agreement by which a party is totally limited by the performance of its rights by the usual judicial procedures or, as far as a contract is concerned, is limited by the usual judicial procedures or limits the time in which it can thus assert its rights is null and void in this regard. Graphic: A tram company manager has agreed to be bound by the chief operating officer to a down payment and a salary for the current month in the event of a violation of the rules. The agreement has been maintained in force. (a) In the event of an infringement, any agreement that prevents an aggrieved party from going to a competent court or limits the time in which it can do so is a non-agreement.